Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 00:02

Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Angelina Jolie’s Daughter Shiloh Debuts New Name for Choreography Work - Just Jared
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What are some cool confidence hacks?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What do you say after "Hi" when chatting?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
US-China trade war sideswipes Europe’s carmakers - politico.eu
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
How far does good behavior take you in a prison?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
NZ nutritional biochemist takes her supplement breakthrough to the market - Stuff